Structural Timber Evaluation
Now, this might seem counterintuitive when managing forest ecosystems…
Assessing the safety and serviceability of older timber structures requires a comprehensive evaluation of the actual mechanical properties of the wood material. This is a critical first step towards diagnosing structural issues, conducting analysis, and defining appropriate strengthening strategies. When dealing with historic buildings or culturally significant timber elements, the assessment might want to minimize any potential damage to the structure.
Two complementary approaches are commonly used to evaluate timber in existing structures: visual strength-grading and non-destructive testing (NDT). Both methods, however, inherently include some level of uncertainty due to the unique characteristics of wood as a material, as well as potential measurement errors and inaccuracies in the correlation between test parameters and structural performance.
Timber as a Unique Material
Wood is a highly anisotropic and heterogeneous material. Its strength and stiffness properties are much higher along the grain (longitudinal direction) compared to the transverse plane. Heterogeneities occur at different scales, from the microscopic to the structural level. At the macro scale, the mechanical behavior is significantly affected by the presence of defects such as knots, reaction wood, checks, and shakes.
Visual strength-grading methods take these macroscopic characteristics, as well as clear wood properties and construction-related defects, into account when assigning lumber to established strength classes. Originally, grading rules were developed for sorting new timber within sawmills, rather than evaluating existing structures. However, these techniques can also be applied to provide information about the load-bearing capacity of timber elements in place.
The main challenge for building inspectors is the lack of standardized procedures and interpretation criteria for many available NDT techniques, as these are often defined solely by the equipment manufacturers. In contrast, formal rules for visually grading new timber were established as early as the 1920s in countries like the USA and have been gradually introduced across Europe over the past 70 years.
Visual Strength-Grading Criteria
The strength and stiffness properties of timber depend on both the clear wood characteristics and the presence and type of defects. Clear wood has a stronger influence on stiffness, as it is more dependent on average properties, while strength is more affected by local weak spots and variations in material properties caused by growth characteristics and handling.
Visual grading focuses on measuring and quantifying macroscopic defects that have a direct impact on timber’s mechanical performance. The main factors considered are:
Density/Growth Rings: Density is an excellent indicator of the amount of wood substance and, consequently, of mechanical properties, as long as the wood is clear of defects. For many softwoods, density is inversely related to growth rate, so ring width is often used as a rough estimate of density and stiffness.
Grain Orientation: The deviation of wood fibers from the longitudinal axis, known as the slope of grain (SoG), is an important consideration for structural applications. Diagonal and spiral grain can have a significant detrimental effect on both strength and stiffness.
Knots: Knots are widely considered the most severe natural defect, as they cause local grain deviations and a reduction in the clear wood cross-sectional area. Visual grading systems typically focus on measuring knot size and location to predict their strength-reducing effect.
Other Defects: Checks, splits, shakes, and decay can also compromise the structural integrity of timber and are accounted for in visual grading criteria. The presence and extent of these defects are assessed and used to downgrade the material.
Different national and regional standards have developed diverse visual grading systems over time, reflecting variations in species, timber dimensions, quality of available material, and historic influences. To harmonize criteria across Europe, the EN 518 standard was issued in 1997, providing general guidelines for visual strength-grading.
Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) Methods
While visual grading relies on the measurement and quantification of macroscopic defects, NDE techniques assess the wood’s mechanical properties by measuring one or more predictor parameters that can be correlated with strength and stiffness. Some common NDE methods include:
Stress Wave and Ultrasound: These techniques measure the propagation speed and attenuation of compression waves through the wood to estimate stiffness and the presence of defects. They can be applied in direct transmission along the grain or in indirect, cross-grain configurations.
Hardness Testing: The resistance of wood to indentation, as measured by the Pilodyn or a modified Janka test, provides an indirect assessment of density and stiffness. Hardness is positively correlated with these properties.
Density Measurements: Techniques like radiation densitometry, micro-drilling resistance, and surface hardness tests can be used to estimate the density of timber members non-destructively. Density is a key indicator of mechanical performance.
The ability of an NDE method to accurately estimate strength depends on how reliably the measured parameter(s) can predict the true strength of the timber and how precisely the characteristics can be quantified. Historically, NDE techniques have been developed and used primarily for grading new timber in sawmills, but they can also be applied to evaluate existing structures.
Standardization and Regulations
The European standard EN 338 defines 12 strength classes for softwood timber and 6 classes for hardwoods, based on the characteristic value of bending strength. In addition to strength, the standard sets requirements for density and bending stiffness as grade-determining properties.
National grading standards have been developed across Europe based on the general guidelines of EN 518. These differ in terms of grading criteria, number of grades, and grade limits, reflecting local species, dimensions, and historical practices.
In the USA, the ASTM D245 standard laid the foundation for strength-grading rules based on visual sorting criteria in the 1920s. American codes also account for the size effect on strength, recognizing that larger members tend to have lower unit strength due to the higher probability of containing a weak link.
Current European standards, however, do not adequately address the size effect, as they reference specific commercial timber dimensions that differ from traditional scantlings used in historic structures. This can lead to inaccurate grading when applied to old timber elements.
Evaluating Existing Structures
Assessing the mechanical properties of timber in existing structures poses additional challenges compared to grading new lumber. The position and configuration of defects relative to the stress distribution in the member become crucial factors, as does the potential presence of hidden or internal flaws.
The Italian standard UNI 11119 was the first code to specifically address the on-site inspection and diagnosis of timber elements in historic buildings. It provides guidelines for visually grading old timber, considering the actual stress distribution and the condition of the material, including decayed or damaged areas.
Additionally, UNI 11119 recommends the combined use of visual grading and NDE methods to obtain a more comprehensive assessment. The standard also emphasizes the need to relate the occurrence of defects to the stress distribution in the member, which is not addressed in most other grading systems.
Experimental Investigations
Researchers at the University of Trento in Italy have conducted an extensive investigation on disassembled old roof beams to compare the results of visual grading, NDE techniques, and destructive bending tests. The key findings include:
- Visual grading methods, when applied to structural-size timber, generally underestimate the actual stiffness and strength of the material. This is likely due to the methods being developed for new, rather than old, timber.
- The hardness test and ultrasound methods showed moderate correlations with the measured bending stiffness, with the hardness test performing slightly better for conditioned specimens.
- The accuracy of all grading methods decreased when evaluating timber at moisture contents other than the standard 12% reference.
- For chestnut elements, the tested grading approaches exhibited poorer correlations compared to the softwood species, highlighting the need to improve criteria for less common structural hardwoods.
The study also emphasized the importance of combining multiple assessment techniques, as no single method was able to adequately predict the mechanical performance of the old timber members. A critical analysis of the gathered data is essential to develop reliable engineering models for the structural analysis of historic timber structures.
Conclusion
Accurately evaluating the load-bearing capacity of timber in existing structures requires a nuanced approach that goes beyond the standard grading methods developed for new lumber. Visual inspection and NDE techniques can provide valuable information, but their limitations might want to be recognized, especially when dealing with the unique characteristics of traditional timber elements.
By understanding the shortcomings of current assessment practices and exploring new approaches that account for the specific challenges of in-situ evaluation, building inspectors and engineers can make more informed decisions about the conservation and structural reinforcement of historic timber structures. Continued research and the development of dedicated standards for on-site timber assessment will be crucial in preserving our architectural heritage.
For the latest insights on sustainable forestry practices, logging techniques, and timber quality assessment, be sure to visit Forestry Contracting.
Example: Forest Road Maintenance Program 2023
